tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8773104906040898250.post7541773860504457885..comments2023-11-02T08:52:21.199-06:00Comments on Steele's Kentucky: Anne’s Overreaching: Blogging Between the QuotesKentuckySteelehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763130353438347069noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8773104906040898250.post-51101104032788913472007-01-25T13:47:00.000-06:002007-01-25T13:47:00.000-06:00KS,
Two things: 1st, Right to Life has made clear...KS,<br /><br />Two things: 1st, Right to Life has made clear that they didn't endorse Hoover because he failed to complete their survey. Do you know how many surveys candidates receive when running for office? He was running unopposed, there was no good reason to fill out every survey he got. Do you know how many unopposed candidates there are who don't seek these types of endorsements? Tons. I see you running around the internet peddling this bs when you know darn good and well that he is strongly pro-life. Tell you what, point out one vote he has ever had that is not pro-life, and I will call him out myself. But if you can't do that, we'll all assume you're just spinning.<br /><br />2cnd - maybe you could offer proof that Anne Northup is a pork barrel spender. I think you believe that because Anne was on the appropriations committee and brought back a lot of funds for her district. Maybe you don't understand how Congress works. Congress as a whole sets the budget. Appropriators then decide where the money will be spent. They don't increase the budget at all. And if you are on the appropriations committee, it would be a huge diservice to your constituents if you failed to fight for your district's fair share. So pushing for district funding as an appropriator and being fiscally conservative is not at all inconsistent. Anne was always known in Congress as someone who held the line on spending - not a big spender.kyconservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18140571460160434742noreply@blogger.com